Beijing Model United Nations 2012| XIX Forum: General Assembly Second Commission
The regulation of medication pricing policies particularly pertaining to
Student Officer: Edward Position:
Deputy Assistant President of the General Assembly II
Introduction
To define the scope of the research, it is essential to primarily define what “Pharmaceutical companies and
agencies” are. The general definition is: The pharmaceutical industry develops, produces, and markets drugs
licensed for use as medications (McGuire). Pharmaceutical companies are allowed to deal in generic and/or brand
medications and medical devices. They are subject to a both domestic and international laws and regulations
regarding the patenting, testing and ensuring safety and efficacy and marketing of drugs. It is this precise process
that has to be curtailed. There is a need for a payment methodology that accurately reflects the costs of products
The issues that must be tackled in the resolutions can be summarized in to three parts: 1. Finding a way to rekindle
proper competition between branded and generic companies. 2. To incentivize Research and Development (R&D),
especially in large pharmaceutical companies and agencies to provide the consumers with the most effective and
up-to-date forms of medication. 3. To simplify the pharmaceutical market approval procedures.
These issues cannot be solved in the short term. However, the pharmaceutical industry is crucial to any and all
nations as no place on Earth is safe from diseases. Particularly those in the developing nations have a greater
incentive to develop this issue as an illness of a worker will result in an economic loss in productivity that person
would have potentially provided to the development of the nation. Therefore, the chair urges the delegates to tackle
this issue with passion and interest as it can truly change lives.
Note: Many of the examples in the Research Report may revolve examples from the United States of America or member nations of the European Union. Just through a little bit of research, each delegate will be able to find the current situation relevant to the issue at hand. The Chair has used the given nations as examples as their Pharmaceutical companies are the most researched and best documented. Definition of Key Terms Research Report | Page 1 of 9
XIX Annual Session| The Hague International Model United Nations 2012 Branded Medicine
Branded medicines – medicines with a proprietary name – account for around 80% of the NHS (National
Health Service) drugs bill in the United Kingdom. The prices of branded medicines are controlled by the
Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS).
Unbranded Medicine
Generic medicines are medicines marketed without a brand name. Through the Drug Tariff, the
Department of Health reimburses pharmacists the cost of dispensing generic medicines, which account for
about four fifths of prescriptions by volume, but only around one fifth of the overall cost of medicines
Pharmaceutical companies and agencies
The pharmaceutical industry develops, produces, and markets drugs licensed for use as medications.
(McGuire) Pharmaceutical companies are allowed to deal in generic and/or brand medications and medical
devices. They are subject to a variety of laws and regulations regarding the patenting, testing and ensuring
safety and efficacy and marketing of drugs.
Pharmaceutical Market Access
Pharmaceutical Market Access usually refers to the processes companies take to get their drugs
commercially available within a given community, country or global region (Encyclopædia).
Pricing and Reimbursement
This term is typically used in a discussion regarding the access to reimbursement. Because reimbursement
is increasingly influenced by pricing, the two terms are regularly found together. Pricing and
reimbursement is usually discussed at a country level, although in countries like Canada and Italy
healthcare spend is distributed at a provincial or regional level (Encyclopædia).
10/90 Gap
The 10/90 gap refers to the statistical finding of the Global Forum for Health Research that only 10% of
worldwide expenditure on health research and development is devoted to the problems that primarily affect
the poorest 90% of the world's population (Stevens).
The 10/90 gap has been criticized on the grounds that "neglected diseases" actually comprise a relatively
small disease burden compared to pneumonia, diarrhea, tobacco and obesity-related diseases, and that
many of the diseases most prevalent in poorer countries are either preventable or easily treatable
Page 2 of 9 | Research Report Beijing Model United Nations 2012| XIX Background Sources of Payment for Pharmaceuticals Self-Pay
Self-pay, or cash, prescriptions represent a shrinking part of the outpatient prescription market. In 1992,
more than one-half (55.6 percent) of all outpatient prescriptions were self-pay (Schondelmeyer). By 1997,
self-pay prescriptions had shrunk to 29.1 percent and in 2002 and 2003 they represent less than 15 percent
of outpatient prescriptions (Schondelmeyer ). The dramatic reduction in cash pay prescriptions has also
greatly reduced the pharmacy’s pricing flexibility. The pharmacy has some control over setting the price
for cash pay prescriptions, but it has little control over the prices paid by public and private third party
programs ( Schondelmeyer). Although mail order programs, private PBMs and drug discount cards all
claim to compare their prices against usual and customary retail prices, the disappearance of the cash pay
retail prescription market renders the concept of “usual and customary retail price” almost meaningless.
Private Third Party (Insurance and Managed Care)
The share of outpatient prescriptions covered in part, or in whole, by private third party programs has
grown substantially over the past decade from 30.1 percent in 1992 to 73.0 percent in 2002 and 2003. Most
of these third party prescriptions are managed through PBMs and networks of pharmacies that have
contracted to participate in these networks. Most pharmacists report that PBMs have most of the
negotiating power in these networks, especially given their growing market share and the dominance of a
Public Third Party (Medicare and Medicaid)
The Medicaid program is the single largest third party program (public or private) for prescription drug
coverage (Cook). In 1992, Medicaid paid for 14.3 percent of all outpatient prescriptions and by 1997 the
Medicaid share had dropped to 11.7 percent. The Medicaid share of outpatient prescription has grown
again over the last five years to 13.0 percent of outpatient prescriptions (Cook). Medicaid recipients in
some states may pay modest co-payments. However, under certain circumstances if the patient cannot pay
the company the pharmacy may still be required to dispense the prescription and the pharmacy may not be
able to recover the lost company from either the patient or the Medicaid program (Berndt).
Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Pharmacy benefit managers are a key part of most third party drug benefit plans (Berndt ). In 2001, the top
three PBMs processed more than one billion of the three billion outpatient prescriptions filled nationally,
and all PBMs together processed 1.5 billion of these prescriptions (Cook). The PBMs serve many functions
including: benefit design and contracting, pharmacy network formation and management, prescription
claims processing, formulary management and rebate negotiation, drug utilization screening and review,
Research Report | Page 3 of 9
XIX Annual Session| The Hague International Model United Nations 2012
operation of mail order pharmacies, and other functions (Berndt). PBMs are a central part of the third party
drug benefit system, but, in general, PBMs do not directly purchase prescription drug products from the
drug manufacturer, take possession of the drug product, or provide the drug product to the patient.
Channels of Distribution Manufacturers and Marketers
The manufacturer level is the starting point for prescription drugs as they begin their movement through
the various channels of distribution (Cook). Any firm that manufactures or sells a prescription drug in
the United States must hold a new drug application (NDA) or an abbreviated new drug application
(ANDA) issued by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). However, other firms may market a
prescription drug without holding either an NDA or an ANDA, if such a firm has entered into a licensing
agreement with an NDA or ANDA holder (Cook).
Wholesalers and Distributors
Manufacturers or marketers of prescription drugs most often sell their drug products to a middleman, or
intermediate level, before the drug product reaches the pharmacy or physician that will provide the drug
to the patient (Hoadly). National wholesalers are the primary intermediate level in the channel of
distribution process accounting for 45.7 percent of prescription drugs ($98.5 billion) in 2002. Other
intermediate channels of distribution include chain warehouses with 32.3 percent ($69.8 billion) of the
market, regional and specialty wholesalers with 9.3 percent ($20.2 billion) of the market, and group
purchasing organizations that usually contract with a wholesaler to perform the distribution function on
their behalf (Hoadly). About 12.6 percent of prescription sales by drug manufacturers are made directly
to providers (e.g., physicians or hospitals) or pharmacies (Berndt).
Pharmacies and Providers
The final step in the channel of distribution for pharmaceuticals comes when the pharmacist or physician
provides the drug to the patient. In most cases, except for mail order pharmacies, this provision of the
drug to the patient results from a face-to-face encounter with the patient (Hoadly). In addition to
providing the drug product, the pharmacist is also responsible for taking steps to assure safe and
effective drug use such as: development of a patient profile to screen for drug interactions,
contraindications, and duplicate therapy; counseling the patient on appropriate use; and other similar
Diseases in lower-income countries
A large proportion of illnesses in low-income countries are entirely avoidable or treatable with existing
medicines or interventions. Most of the disease burden in low-income countries finds its roots in the
consequences of poverty, such as poor nutrition, indoor air pollution and lack of access to proper sanitation
Page 4 of 9 | Research Report Beijing Model United Nations 2012| XIX
and health education (Stevens). The WHO estimates that diseases associated with poverty account for 45
per cent of the disease burden in the poorest countries. (WHO) However, nearly all of these deaths are
either treatable with existing medicines or preventable in the first place (Stevens).
Malaria
Malaria can be prevented through a combination of spraying dwellings with DDT, usinginsecticide treated
mosquito nets and taking prophylactic medicines such as mefloquine, doxyclycline and malorone. Malaria
can also be treated with artemisin in combination therapy. Education can also play an important role in
reducing the incidence of insect-borne diseases, for example by encouraging people to remove sources of
stagnant water (insect breeding sites) from near their dwellings (Stevens).
Diarrhoeal diseases
Diarrhoeal diseases are caused by the poor sanitation inherent to the condition of poverty, yet are easily and
cheaply treatable through oral rehydration therapy. However, diarrhoeal diseases still claim 1.8 million
Malnutrition
Malnutrition particularly affects people in poor countries. As a result of vitamin A deficiency, for example,
500,000 children become blind each year,17 despite the fact that such outcomes can be avoided by cheap,
easy-to-administer food supplements (Vitamin A supplements).
Major Parties Involved National Health Service (NHS)
The NHS spends about £9 billion a year on branded prescription medicines in the UK (Hollis). The Pharmaceutical
Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) is the mechanism which the Department of Health (on behalf of the UK health
departments) uses to ensure that the NHS has access to good quality branded medicines at reasonable prices. The
scheme seeks to achieve a balance between reasonable prices for the NHS and a fair return for the industry to
enable it to research, develop and market new and improved medicines.
World Health Organization (WHO)
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) that acts as a
coordinating authority on international public health. Established on 7 April 1948, with headquarters in Geneva,
Switzerland, the agency inherited the mandate and resources of its predecessor, the Health Organization, which was
an agency of the League of Nations. It is a member of the United Nations Development Group.
Health Impact Fund (HIF) Research Report | Page 5 of 9
XIX Annual Session| The Hague International Model United Nations 2012
The Health Impact Fund is a proposed new way of paying for pharmaceutical innovation. The HIF would
incentivize the development and delivery of new medicines by paying for performance. All pharmaceutical firms
worldwide would have the option of registering new medicines with the HIF. By registering, a firm agrees to
provide its drug at cost anywhere it is needed, and in exchange for foregoing the normal profits from drug sales, the
firm is rewarded based on the HIF’s assessment of the actual global health impact of the drug. Governments and
OneWorld Health
OneWorld Health is a nonprofit drug development organization founded in 2000. Its mission is to discover, develop,
and deliver safe, effective and affordable new treatments and interventions for people with neglected infectious
diseases in the developing countries, with an emphasis on diseases that disproportionately afflict children. The
organization aims to serve as a positive agent for change by saving lives, improving health, and fulfilling the
promise of medicine for those most in need. It works with partners around the globe to identify potential new
medicines for neglected infectious diseases afflicting vulnerable populations in developing countries, assess the
safety and effectiveness of investigational medicines, honor international ethical standards for research, collaborate
to manufacture and distribute new medicines, and ensure that medicines will be affordable and available for
Medicaid
Medicaid is the United States health program for certain people and families with low incomes and resources. It is a
means-tested program that is jointly funded by the state and federal governments, and is managed by the states.
People served by Medicaid are U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents, including low-income adults, their
children, and people with certain disabilities. Poverty alone does not necessarily qualify someone for Medicaid.
Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services for people with limited income in
Medicare
Medicare is a social insurance program administered by the United States government, providing health insurance
coverage to people who are aged 65 and over; to those who are under 65 and are permanently physically disabled
or who have a congenital physical disability; or to those who meet other special criteria like End Stage Reneal
Previous Attempts to Resolve the Issue
The example of the Health Impact Fund (HIF) is one of the best known examples of an organized attempt of an
NGO to tackle the issue of the regulation of medication pricing policies particularly pertaining to pharmaceutical
Page 6 of 9 | Research Report Beijing Model United Nations 2012| XIX
The HIF approached to solving problems of innovation and access to pay directly for what is valuable, and not to
ration access on the basis of artificially high prices (Hollis). Rather, it was designed to give incentives for
innovation, the strength of which is proportional to the social value of the innovation, as measured by health impact.
(Hollis) As a result, the patent system rewards innovation which addresses the health needs of the wealthy much
more than those of the poor (Hollis). The HIF redresses this imbalance and motivates firms to invest in research
The HIF attempted to implement this firstly on a small scale. It will have a certain amount of fund that was openly
available for any company to apply for. In order to apply for this fund, the companies had to register the medicine
under the HIF, which in return, calculated its Health Impact for the next 10 years. During the 10 years, the
company was paid depending on the changes it was able to instill in the usage of medicine; whether it has
surpassed a competitor, or gained immense market shares in short periods of times. This directly correlated in to the
amount of funds that the company was to receive from the patented medicine. However, after 10 years, the
medicine that was licensed was to go generic, and the company could no longer gain any profit from the patent
According to Thomas Pogge, this ideal was the panacea to all the issues that were causing the immense inflation in
price of the pharmaceutical industry. It was thought to reduce the competition in the industry and was also
estimated to be able to motivate companies to increase their investment on R&D. However, despite its extensive
research, the HIF was never implemented on a large scale and still waits for a more advanced form of price control.
Refer to this video link for a more in-depth research regarding this attempt:
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/thomas_pogge_medicine_for_the_99_percent.html
Possible Solutions
Government cooperation is particularly essential when tackling this issue; not only because the NGOs have
limits as to their ability to interfere in events occurring in a country, but also because the price controlling
has previously been entrusted to the industry and it has resulted with little success. In fact, governments
work with delegations to influence negotiations in the WTO and the World Health Assembly. They are
allied with think tanks – such as the South Centre, an inter-governmental research center – who worked
closely with the governments of Brazil and other like minded countries to push forward the WIPO
Development Agenda, a significant reform of an international organization. These governments take the
positions they do in WIPO and WTO as a result of pressure from local civil society organizations at home.
Therefore, urging member nations to take a more active role will accelerate the pace of solving this issue.
Research Report | Page 7 of 9
XIX Annual Session| The Hague International Model United Nations 2012
It is essential that the UN provides enough incentive for key parties to provide data. Pricing data will be
needed from various levels in the market to determine appropriate payment amounts. If the program
establishes fair, but not excessive prices, providers will be more likely to participate in good faith than if
the program tries to implement below-market prices that overly squeeze the provider’s margins. In addition,
terms must be clearly defined so that firms understand what data they are expected to submit and so that
analysts understand what data they have received.
Any payment scheme creates financial incentives for providers. Ideally, these incentives foster quality and
cost-effectiveness. Two main dimensions of provider incentives have already been discussed. First,
adequate compensation gives providers incentives to participate in the program and supports beneficiary
access. Second, payment based on actual acquisition costs creates neutral incentives for providers
regarding the choice of drug therapy with the result that providers are more likely to focus on the choice of
therapy that is optimal for the patient and economically efficient for the program.
Bibliography
John L. McGuire, Horst Hasskarl, Gerd Bode, Ingrid Klingmann, Manuel Zahn "Pharmaceuticals, General Survey"
Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology" Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
"Medicaid." New York State Department of Health. Dec. 2011. Web. 06 Jan. 2012.
<http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/>.
"HHS' Conference on Pharmaceutical Pricing Practices, Utilization, and Costs, August 8th & 9th." Conference on Pharmaceutical Pricing Practices, Utilization, and Costs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
2 Jan. 2001. Web. 06 Jan. 2012. <http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/Drug-papers/>.
Stevens, Philip. "Diseases of Poverty and the 10/90 Gap." International Policy Network, Nov. 2004. Web. 7 Jan.
2012. <http://www.policynetwork.net/sites/default/files/Diseases_of_Poverty_FINAL.pdf>.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group, Fatal Imbalance: The Crisis in Research and Development for
Drugs for Neglected Diseases, MSF, September 2001
WHO, Vitamin A supplements: a guide to their use in the treatment and prevention of vitamin A deficiency and
Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc, 2012. Web. 6 Jan. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/>.
Schondelmeyer, Stephen W., and Marian V. Wrobel. "Medicaid and Medicare Drug Pricing: Strategy to Determine
Market Prices." Medicaid and Medicare Drug Pricing: Strategy to Determine Market Prices. Abt
Page 8 of 9 | Research Report Beijing Model United Nations 2012| XIX
Associates Inc., 30 Aug. 2004. Web. 6 Jan. 2012.
<http://www.abtassoc.org/reports/CMS_Drug_Pricing_Final_Report_Aug_2004.pdf>.
Cook, Anna. "Why Different Purchasers Pay Different Prices for Prescription Drugs."Conference on Pharmaceutical Pricing Practices, Utilization and Costs. Leavey Conference Center, Georgetown
University Washington, DC, 8 Aug. 2000. Web. 06 Jan. 2012. <http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/Drug-
Hoadly, Jock. "Prescription Drug Coverage, Spending, Utilization, and Prices." Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, HHS. Prescription Drug Conference, 8 Aug. 2000. Web. 06 Jan. 2012.
<http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/Drug-papers/hoadley.htm>.
Berndt, Ernest R. "Factors Driving Pharmaceutical Expenditures: An Overview." Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, HHS. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the National Bureau of
Economic Research, 8 Aug. 2000. Web. 06 Jan. 2012. http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/Drug-
Hollis, Aidan, and Thomas Pogge. "Making New Medicines Accessible for All." The Health Impact Fund.
Incentives for Global Health, 2008. Web. 6 Jan. 2012.
Appendix or Appendices
http://media.transparency.org/imaps/cpi2009/ (Transparency International’s annual CPI)
Transparency International is always an amazing organization to insert in to your clauses to ensure transparency in your resolution. One important thing to note is that Transparency International DOES charge. It is not a non-profit- organization, and it is not a panacea to all issues of transparency (it is extremely difficult to ensure the transparency of a government through the use of Transparency International). However, in the case of our topic at hand, TI can easily be used to ensure the process of medicine manufacturing or the price list and other information provided by the pharmaceutical industry is valid and transparent. Research Report | Page 9 of 9
Implementing Information Dependent Acquisition to an Hybrid RF/DC Quadrupole- Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer Alina Dindyal, Jane Y. Zhao, Nic Bloomfield, J.C. Yves Le Blanc, Applied Biosystems|MDS Sciex, 71 Four Valley Drive, Concord (Ontario) L4K 4V8, Canada OVERVIEW Figure 2. IDA Detection of Buspirone Metabolites from Rat Liver Microsome IDA for the Identificati
January 2008 PROTOCOLS OPEN AT FINGER LAKES HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY BREAST: ECOG-PACCT-1: Program for the Assessment of Clinical Cancer tests (PACCT-1): Trial assigning individualized options for treatment: The TAILORx Trial (*ER and/or PR +; 1.1 to 5.0 cm tumor; unfavorable features=intermediate or poor nuclear and/or histologic grade, or lymphovascular A Double-Blind Ph