Clinical review of drug contraindications and allergies
CLINICAL REVIEW OF DRUG CONTRAINDICATIONS AND ALLERGIES IN THE
understanding of the system and how best to
METROPOLITAN AMBULANCE SERVICE
It is important to note that this work was
The value of this clinical collection system
has been identified by most other ambulance
services in Australia with some already using
the system and others about to sign-up for
access to it. This means that in the near
providing evidence of our practice, there is
future most, if not all services will be using a
still a significant input required from clinical
common system which will enable improved
and technical personnel in designing and
testing the validity of various reports.
John Winterton, Manager Clinical Support
and Salman Sabir, our Data Retrieval Officer
Meanwhile, the Paramedic Education &
accomplished this work after a consistent and
focussed effort over a number of weeks. They
conduct an electronic review into the use of
all pharmacology guidelines authorised for
This report indicates that MAS paramedics
perform to a high standard and that evidence
This review looked at all drug administrations
can be collected and reported on quickly
in the light of the indicated contraindications,
enabling clinical improvements to be made on
as defined in the 2006 edition of the Clinical
Practice Guidelines (CPGs). The period of
the review was for the first six months of
The work completed for this report is the
beginning of an exciting era of evidenced
based practice, which we have all sought for
accessed during this time period. All ePCRs
were electronically searched to identify the
I would like to personally congratulate all
MAS paramedics on their high standard of
care in relation to patient care and for their
Any previous work of this nature would have
patience in assisting the implementation of
involved a laborious and tedious process of
hand searching and data entry before any
analysis could take place. The use of the
electronic system enabled the review to be
completed quickly and accurately for prompt
Introduction
I would like to congratulate all those involved
successfully implemented into all MAS teams.
We have been focussed on seeking feedback
from paramedics to ensure the electronic
acceptance of the change from written to
collection of clinical information continues to
be developed as a user-friendly process.
The conversion from the hand-written Patient
Care Record (PCR) to the electronic ePCR was a significant challenge for some and a substantial change to previous ambulance practice. However at this time it is apparent that most paramedics have a good practical understanding and use of the system.
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Acetylsalicylic Acid – Aspirin
Over the first six months of 2007, Adrenaline
The contraindications for the administration of
Acetylsalicylic Acid as defined in the current
Adrenaline administrations to patients presenting in hypovolaemic shock without fluid replacement
• Hypersensitivity to aspirin / salicylates
No of pts who were administered Adrenaline for
hypovolaemic shock without fluid replacement
Acetylsalicylic Acid was administered on
compromised, peripheral vasoconstriction and tachycardia occur in the endeavour to Aspirin administrations to patients with documented compensate for the falling blood pressure. allergy or hypersensitivity Adrenaline is contraindicated in this cohort of considerably vasoconstricted. Hypovolaemia
No of patients who were administered Aspirin to
is best managed by intravenous fluid
1. One patient initially denied he had an allergy to Aspirin. After
receiving Aspirin, remembered that he had allergy, and soon developed onset of anaphylaxis. MICA attended and treated
Amiodarone
The contraindications for the administration of
Aspirin administrations to patients with documented pre- existing bleeding disorder
Amiodarone as defined in the current CPG
No of pts who were administered Aspirin with
documented pre-existing bleeding disorders
Aspirin administrations to patients with diagnosed G.I.
No of pts who were administered Aspirin with
Aspirin administrations to patients with suspected aortic aneurysm
No of pts who were administered Aspirin with
Amiodarone administrations to patients with documented One of the actions of Aspirin is that it reduces allergy or hypersensitivity platelet aggregationthat in turn affects the clotting processes. Hence it should not be
No of pts administered Amiodarone where a
administered to patients who are actively
known allergy or hypersensitivity to the drug was
bleeding or have bleeding disorders.Adrenaline Tartrate Amiodarone administrations to pregnant patients
The contraindication for the administration of
No of pts administered Amiodarone where the
Adrenaline as defined in the current CPG
patient was identified as being pregnant
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Amiodarone administrations to patients in inadequately Fentanyl Citrate administrations to patients with perfused VT documented allergy or hypersensitivity
Total no. of Fentanyl Citrate administrations
No of pts administered Fentanyl Citrate where a
conscious VT and were inadequately perfused,
known allergy or hypersensitivity to the drug was
where MICA crews administered Amiodarone
Frusemide
There is no listed contraindication for the
Amiodarone has both negative chronotropic
administration of Frusemide in the current
and inotropic actions. In the presence of a patient who becomes hypotensive, the effects can be significantly detrimental whilst still not
Over the first six months of 2007, Frusemide
guaranteeing a reversion of VT. Elective cardioversion is the preferred management in Frusemide administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity Atropine Sulphate
There are no listed contraindications for the
No of pts administered Frusemide where a known
administration of Atropine Sulphate in the
Glyceryl Trinitrate
Over the first six months of 2007, Atropine
The contraindications for the administration of
Glyceryl Trinitrate as defined in the current
Atropine Sulphate administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity
• Systolic blood pressure < 110 mmHg
Total no. of Atropine Sulphate administrations
No of pts administered Atropine Sulphate where a
• Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg
known allergy to the drug was documented.
Ceftriaxone
The contraindication for the administration of
Ceftriaxone as defined in the current CPG
• Allergies to Cephalosporin Antibiotics
Over the first six months of 2007, Ceftriaxone
• Inferior STEMI with systolic BP < 160
Ceftriaxone administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity
Over the first six months of 2007, GTN was
Total no. of Ceftriaxone administrations
administered on 10,840 occasions. Of the
No of pts administered Ceftriaxone where a
10,840 administrations recorded, GTN was
known allergy to the drug was documented.
delivered by means of 0.4 mg/hr patch on
2900 occasions, and by means of tablet on
Fentanyl Citrate
The contraindications for the administration of
Fentanyl Citrate as defined in the current
Over the first six months of 2007, Fentanyl Citrate was administered on 327 occasions. Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
GTN Tablet Administration GTN Patch Application GTN tablet administrations with documented allergy or GTN patch applications with documented allergy or hypersensitivity hypersensitivity GTN tablet administrations with documented systolic GTN patch applications with documented systolic blood blood pressure of <110/P pressure of <90/P
No of pts with documented systolic blood
No of pts with documented systolic blood
pressure of <110/P immediately prior to
pressure of <90/P immediately prior to application
GTN patch applications with documented bradycardia GTN tablet administrations with documented bradycardia
immediately prior to GTN tablet administration
5. Of the 68 administrations, 17 were administered to patients
3. Of the 254 administrations, 41 were administered to patients GTN patch applications with documented heart rates 150> GTN tablet administrations with documented heart rates 150> min
No of pts with documented Heart Rates 150>
No of pts with documented Heart Rates 150>
GTN patch applications with documented ST elevation in GTN tablet administrations with documented ST elevation inferior leads/Inferior infarction with BP <160/P in inferior leads/Inferior infarction with BP <160/P
No of pts with applied GTN patches following
No of pts with administered GTN tablets following
documented ST elevation in inferior leads/inferior
documented ST elevation in inferior leads/inferior
4. One pt’s BP dropped to 70/S post administration and
GTN patch applications whilst in Ventricular Tachycardia
Total no. of GTN patches administrations
Two patients suffered VF arrests some 6 minutes post
No of pts given GTN patches when the patient
administration and were successfully cardioverted. It is
difficult to determine if the administration of GTN in these patients was a contributing factor to the cardiac arrest or
GTN patch applications to patients medicated with Viagra, Levitra or Cailis where GTN tablet administrations whilst in Ventricular Tachycardia
Total no. of GTN patches administrations
No of pts given GTN patches who have taken
Sildenafil Citrate “VIAGRA” or Vardenafil
No of pts administered GTN tablets when the
“LEVITRA” within the previous 24 hours or
Tadalafil “CAILIS” within the previous 4 days
GTN tablet administrations to patients medicated with Viagra, Levitra or Cailis where Due to the hypotensive side effect of GTN, it
No of pts administered GTN tablets who have
is not to be administered to patients with
taken Sildenafil Citrate “VIAGRA” or Vardenafil
tachycardia/VT over the rate of 150/min as
“LEVITRA” within the previous 24 hours or
the heart is usually unable to compensate
Tadalafil “CAILIS” within the previous 4 days
any faster. There is a higher risk of blood pressure collapse in this cohort of patients. GTN should also not be administered to patients who have indications of an inferior infarct (ST elevation in lead II and/or III,) with an associated BP of less than 160/S as it potentially increases the incidence of right
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
GTN should also not be administered to
Over the first six months of 2007, Lignocaine
patients in bradycardia, as one of the
Hydrochloride was administered on only 2
infarction/ischaemia can be the presence of Lignocaine Hydrochloride administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity Hydrocortisone Sodium Succinate
The contraindication for the administration of
No of pts administered Lignocaine Hydrochloride
where a known allergy or hypersensitivity to the
Hydrocortisone Sodium Succinate as defined
Metaraminol Bitartrate
There is no listed contraindication for the
administration of Metaraminol Bitartrate in the
However, over the first six months of 2007,
Metaraminol Bitartrate was administered on
Hydrocortisone Sodium Succinate administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity Metaraminol Bitartrate administrations to patients with
Total no. of Hydrocortisone Sodium Succinate
documented allergy or hypersensitivity
No of pts administered Hydrocortisone Sodium
Succinate where a known allergy to the drug was
administrations No of pts administered Metaraminol Bitartrate
Ipratropium Bromide
The contraindication for the administration of
Methoxyflurane
Ipratropium Bromide as defined in the current
The contraindications for the administration of
Methoxyflurane as defined in the current CPG
• Known hypersensitivity to Atropine or
• Pre-existing renal disease/impairment
Over the first six months of 2007, Ipratropium
• Exceeding total dose of 6 ml in a 24
Ipratropium Bromide administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity
Total no. of Ipratropium Bromide administrations
Methoxyflurane was administered on 17,692
No. of pts administered Ipratropium Bromide
hypersensitivity to Atropine or its derivatives was
Patients given more than 6 mls of Methoxyflurane over a 24 hour period Lignocaine Hydrochloride
Total no. of Methoxyflurane administrations
No of pts administered more than 6 mls of
Lignocaine Hydrochloride is a drug that has
ventricular arrhythmias. The contraindication
Methoxyflurane administrations to patients with documented renal failure
Hydrochloride as defined in the current CPG
Total no. of Methoxyflurane administrations
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Methoxyflurane administrations to patients with of blood in the gut. This reduces the documented current use of tetracycline antibiotics
tamponade effect, resulting in the potential for
Total no. of Methoxyflurane administrations
No of pts with documented current tetracycline
experienced following the administration of metoclopramide. The incidence of these se side effects occurring (especially dystonic reactions), are greater in children than in Methoxyflurane potentially has nephrotoxic adults; hence its use is contraindicated in effects and accordingly is not to be diagnosed renal failure/impairment.Midazolam The concurrent use of tetracycline and
The contraindication for the administration of
Methoxyflurane has been reported to result in
Midazolam defined in the current CPG book
Metoclopramide
The contraindications for the administration of
Metoclopramide as defined in the current
Over the first six months of 2007, Midazolam
Midazolam administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity to benzodiazepines
No of pts with documented allergy administered
Metoclopramide was administered on 3,608
Morphine Sulphate
The contraindications for the administration of
Metochlopramide administrations to patients with
Morphine Sulphate as defined in the current
documented pre-existing or suspected bowel obstruction, perforation or gastrointestinal bleed
Total no. of Metoclopramide administrations
No of pts with documented pre-existing or
suspected bowel obstruction or perforation or
Over the first six months of 2007, Morphine
Metochlopramide administrations to patients who were aged under 15 years Morphine Sulphate adminstrations to patients in late
Total no. of Metoclopramide administrations
second stage of labour
No of pts with documented administration of
Metoclopramide who were aged under 15 years
Total no. of Morphine Sulphate administrations
Five of the six patients were given Metoclopramide following
No of pts in late second stage of labour who were
consultation with the receiving hospital.
Metoclopramide accelerates peristalsis and Morphine Sulphate administrations to patients with gastric emptying. If administered to a patient documented allergy or hypersensitivity
with bowel obstruction, the intestinal content
Total no. of Morphine Sulphate administrations
will be forced at a faster rate to the point of obstruction, thus exacerbating the condition.
hypersensitivity administered Morphine Sulphate
7. Of the 26 cases, the majority of indicated allergies was
Metoclopramide will accelerate the passage
previously asking pt of allergies prior.
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Prochlorperazine
One pt had a significant hypotensive episode post Morphine administration (2.5mg) despite being previously advised that
The contraindications for the administration of
Prochlorperazine as defined in the current
One pt received Morphine following consultation.
Naloxone Hydrochloride
There is no listed contraindication for the
administration of Naloxone Hydrochloride in
Over the first six months of 2007, Naloxone
Prochlorperazine was administered on 130
Prochlorperazine administrations patients documented allergy or hypersensitivity Naloxone Hydrochloride administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity
Total no. of Prochlorperazine administrations
No of pts with documented allergy administered
No of pts administered Naloxone Hydrochloride
Prochlorperazine administrations to patients with documented circulatory collapse
Total no. of Prochlorperazine administrations
Pancuronium Bromide
No of pts with documented circulatory collapse
The contraindications for the administration of
Prochlorperazine administrations patients documented CNS depression
Total no. of Prochlorperazine administrations
No of pts with documented CNS depression
Prochlorperazine administrations to patients who were aged under 15 years
Total no. of Prochlorperazine administrations
No of pts with documented CNS depression
Prochlorperazine can cause very serious acute dystonic reactions in children leading to Pancuronium Bromide administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity requiring artificial ventilation, life-threatening tetanus-like syndromes, coma and even death. These reactions can occur with a
No of pts administered Pancuronium Bromide
It is also proven to have other CNS effects Pancuronium Bromide administrations to patients with no including seizures, headache, insomnia, documented use of pulse oximetry/capnography catatonia, and hyperpyrexia. If the patient already presents with CNS depression, any
No of pts administered Pancuronium Bromide
where the use of pulse oximetry only was not
No of pts administered Pancuronium Bromide
Likewise, if the patient is presenting with
where the use of neither pulse oximetry nor
circulatory collapse, the potential hypotensive
8. All 8 cases were post cardiac arrested patients.
and cardiac side effects of the drug may severely compromise the patient even further.
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Salbutamol
There is no listed contraindication for the
Suxamethonium can cause can cause an
administration of Salbutamol in the current
Over the first six months of 2007, Salbutamol
If the patient is paralysed and intubation Salbutamol administrations to patients with documented allergy or hypersensitivity patient’s respiratory drive is negated and ventilation may then be compromised
No of pts administered Salbutamol where a
particularly if the patient has increased
known allergy to the drug was documented.
Suxamethonium Chloride Verapamil Hydrochloride
The contraindications for the administration of
Suxamethonium Chloride as defined in the
The contraindications for the administration of
Verapamil Hydrochloride as defined in the
Over the first six months of 2007, Verapamil
Verapamil Hydrochloride administrations
administrations No of pts administered Verapamil Hydrochloride
on 142 occasions. Of the 142 administrations
where a known allergy or contraindication to the
recorded, Suxamethonium Chloride was not
On reviewing drug administration over the
first 6 months of 2007, there were 56,983
occasions where drugs10 were administered
allergic to the drug or contraindicated for its
use. This reflects in an overall compliance
Suxamethonium administrations to patients with documented severe respiratory distress
These figures exclude the administration of
Total no. of Suxamethonium administrations
No of pts with documented respiratory rates of 30
No of pts with documented respiratory rates of 40
or higher/min to whom crews administered
9. These cases may have elevated respiratory rates due to a
variety of factors including pain response, hypovolaemia or hypoxia. Not all are necessarily contraindicated.
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
• There was very limited use of a drug
It is interesting to note that the review has
highlighted an issue regarding the use of
Glyceryl Trinitrate where paramedics noted
defined contraindications, GTN administration
The findings of this work concerning the
presence of a stated contraindication will be
further investigated over the next few months.
It is reasonable to say that while some of the
GTN Contraindications were changed in 2006
and these changes were based upon the best
available information, many paramedics have
expressed concern that some of the changes
in the GTN contraindications were excessive. The evaluation of the use of GTN, where there are recorded Contraindications, will determine if there has been any harm observed in these variations or there is a question around the applicability of some of the contraindications. The result of this next piece of work will be useful feedback to the CPG Working Group and
Clinical Review of Drug Contraindications and Allergies.doc
Rosen Centre Participants Orlando, FL October 8-9, 2009 Julio Ablanedo Orie Barnes Thomas Agonis Calvin Bates Don Ahrens Jeffrey Baysinger Ahmad Amer John Beard Thomas Anderson Thomas Bernacki Ken Anthony Carol Berrigan Senior Director, Industry Infrastructure Jeffrey Argento Terry Bettes Alan Ashlock Curtiss-Wright Flo
Powerless to Tackle Piracy? The naval forces face a thankless task. Theiral community needs to involve the littoral coun-course of action is rather limited by three self-tries in the fight against piracy. A “Cooperativeimposed restrictions. The safe havens of the pi-Mechanism at the Horn of Africa” needs to berates are not to be attacked despite the fact thatestablished copying the